Hello Kitty : the mark of shame

Thai police use Hello Kitty armbands as punishment:

The armband is large, bright pink and has a Hello Kitty motif with two hearts embroidered on it.

So if you come late to work at the station — you have to wear Hello Kitty! I know so many people for whom this would not be considered punishment that it just seems plain weird to me. Of course, the arm band probably clashes horribly with the uniform color…

Shinteki 3 :

Yesterday I competed with my lovely teammates Darcy, Michael, and Val, as team Get on a Raft with Taft in the Shinteki 3 Puzzle Decathlon. We came in 6th, just 5 points (out of 1200) behind number 5, which was pretty good, I thought. Many of the puzzles were designed by Ian Tullis, who is quite adroit at constructing physical clues of the sort that we rarely get at the Mystery Hunt. Shinteki’s tend to emphasize the running-around aspect of things quite a bit (like the Game, which I still haven’t done — shelling out $200 to play would break my already too-large puzzling budget). The theme this year was space and time, or something along those lines. At the start of the race they give each team a Palm (like in MH2K3) into which you can put in guesses or partial answers, and from which you can buy hints (that deduct from your point total). To start a puzzle you have to enter its start code. Partial solutions will open up hints, and after a certain amount of time on a puzzle hints will become free. Each puzzle also has a bonus answer, which can usually be solved by going down the wrong path while finding the solution. The whole thing is timed so that teams will get skipped over a puzzle if they are running too late.

The Decathlon started out with a group event about “string theory” — each team was given a scrabble tile. On the baseball field were several tangled stars of rope, each of which had a letter marked on the end. Each team’s letter was mixed up with two other’s (I believe) in a single star, and you had to run over there and tie the four ends to the belt loops of the four people on your team. Then the teams in each star had to do-si-do and try to untangle the ropes. Once you were done, you had to bunch up the two ropes and run over and toss them from a distance into a basket (if you missed your ropes would be flung as far away as possible and you had to start over). If you did all that you got the solution word to open up the next location…

… which was the amazing Garden of Eden in the Excelsior neighborhood near the Balboa Park BART station. By searching you find an envelope with a bunch of Trivial Pursuit-style clues. Each card had one answer that was the name of a Decathlon puzzle type, and the other answers were synonyms or antonyms. The reverse of each card features the Shinteki 3-circle Venn diagram logo with one segment shaded in corresponding to the color of the clue whose answer is the puzzle type. If you shade in all of the synonyms, you can get each card to yield up a letter (if you squint right). In card order, those give the answer words. The bonus is an acrostic of the puzzle types in order, which spells “WACKO MEETS,” an apt description for this event. The puzzle was very elegant, but I wasn’t a huge fan of the “are these really letters?” step.

The third event was in Golden Gate Park, near Stow Lake, where we had 4 minipuzzles. One was a digital clock-face LED puzzle where you had to take the complement of the lit segments, one was an art installation where you looked at objects which were sort of 3-D representations of letters (a cup for U, a weird bundt-cake pan shaped thing for W, etc.), one was a spiral word chain with trigram overlaps where you read the upcrossing diagonal for the solution word, and one was a stereogram thing that I didn’t understand. Solving these 4 tells you to take two pictures in the park using the camera in the Palm, and then take them to a location in the Botanical Gardens. This gets you the final puzzle, which is a series of two-word crosses with clues whose answers each contain “point”, “line”, “plane”, “space”, or “time,” which are entered into a single letter in the grid. The crossing letters give a cluephrase (FIFTH BASE). Mapping the 5 special words into 0-4 and reading off the numbers for each cross in base 5 gives the answer. The bonus was a message in 0’s, 1’s, and 3’s, which can be interpreted as “dot,” “dash,” and “space” to get a message in Morse. All in all, a pretty fun running-around break from sitting pondering Trivial Pursuit.

Puzzle 4 was near Lake Merced, and was a 3-D PVC tube construction of two “window panes” attached via their 4 corners. Each segment had a hole cut into it, and inside the structure were 8 colored marbles. You had to figure out in which segments each colored marble could go — these paths were disjoint and looked like letters (although lower case r and capital L were similar). In rainbow order these spelled the answer word. This puzzle was a great idea, but it was obvious to us what we had to do and just gathering enough data was mind-bogglingly tedious.

We had to hike out to Mori Point (in Pacifica?) to get the next clue, which was again 5 minipuzzles — a minesweeper, a paint-by-numbers, a diagramless crossword, and a 3-D maze, all of which were in a 4x4x4 cube. For each puzzle you took the “black” squares, which formed a 3-d contiguous piece, and constructed it out of the toy cubes they gave you. These could be put together to form a 4x4x4 cube with a missing piece, which was the missing “5th” minipuzzle. Looking at that shape from three directions gave the letters “HOT,” which was the answer. The puzzle was awesome in its construction but I was incompetent at assembling the cube.

Next was a jaunt over to at a park near the Bay in San Mateo. There were 7 circles made out of sidewalk cement, with two-grooves each way to make 9 sections (a grid on a circle, if you will). In each circle were a set of numbers written in different colors in different orientations. If you stood facing each of the 4 directions, treated the 9 segments as a keypad, and typed into your phone the corresponding keys in the order of the digits, you got a 4 word phrase to clue a word for that pad. The 7 words each had a run of one “key” (so CRABCAKES has ABCA, which all correspond to 2). Taking these gives the 7-letter answer. We rocked this one out, and I liked the concept quite a bit.

We then went to a park somewhere (San Bruno?) and did the easiest event, which made us masters of space and time. Two team members, blindfolded, had to walk 100 feet and plant a flag within a small circle. The other two had to count 100 seconds exactly. You got partial points for however well you did.

We were too late by the time we got to 7, so were skipped over 8 and went straight to 9, which involved going to a video store and requesting some B-movie. Inside the case were 6 squares and 8 triangles with dots and numbers on them, and slits on the edges so you could slide them together. Using some given rules you could construct a cube-octahedron and then trace out a path of dots which were “raised” if you looked at the thing through 3d glasses. Along each edge in the shape were 3 dots from the two faces incident on that edge, which gave a letter in Braille if you thought of the dots as raised. In path order you got a cluephrase for a the answer word. That was nice and thematic, with “raised dots” being Braille, unlike some puzzles where you say “oh I’ll just try every encoding on this.”

We had very little time to finish the 10th puzzle, which was a long clue list with all 9-letter answers, two grids, and a set of trigrams. Solving the clues and eliminating the trigrams from the list gives 3 remaining trigrams, which spell a clue phrase. The rules for entering words into the grid were a bit complicated, but do-able if we only had 20-30 more minutes, which we didn’t. Then again, no other team made it through this puzzle either, since the event had to end at 10 sharp. It looked like a really fun puzzle, though.

All in all, this was a nice set of puzzles which were elegant in mechanism and construction. I particularly appreciated the working in of thematic material, such as the dot-line-plane-space-time thing and the Braille. The downside of course is the driving around — a lot of time is killed just getting from point-A to point-B. But that is the way with all of these runaround games.

The Phrontistery

Via the NPL mailing list, I learned of The Phrontistery, a collection of “lost words” which are non-spelling-variant, non-regional Modern English words with entries in the OED that do not (obviously) appear elsewhere on the web. There are some great words in there — I highly recommend them the next time you need to fulfill your hemerine serving of traboccant verbiage.

(I hope blogging with these words doesn’t remove them from the list!)

Update: Missing E (for Erin) added in title.

Open Reviewing

I just noticed this news on the IT Society webpage.

On an experimental basis, open reviewing of submissions to the Transactions will be allowed to complement the standard procedure. If a paper preprint is posted on ArXiv (http://www.arxiv.org/), with the explicit indication “Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,” then its readers are allowed to send their comments about it to the Editor-in-Chief, Ezio Biglieri. Provided that these comments are not frivolous or obviously biased, the Editor-in-Chief will forward them to the Associate Editor in charge of the paper as a supplement of regular peer reviews.

I wonder how many people will actually do this — everyone I know who does a fair bit of reviewing seems overwhelmed by their own load and wouldn’t really have the time to send a comment on another paper. What it probably will do is improve the connections to related literature, since I’m guessing more people read the abstract of the preprint on ArXiV than do if/when it is published in the Transactions.

I’m now on the Web resources mailing list for the IT Society and there has been some discussion of how to start some discussion or comments thread for ArXiV-ed papers. There seems to be a push for an “opening up” of the review process in general. Not that the technical review should be opened up, but that the value of a preprint is that its perceived impact can be discussed (semi)-publicly. The epistemology of that distinction is pretty interesting, I think…

ASEE fellowships blog

Apparently the ASEE has a fellowships blog. They administered my NDSEG fellowship back in the day. It seems to be laden with NSF news, but I think it’s a new feature, so I’m sure it will develop over time. Hopefully it will be a good resource for undergrads and early grad students to navigate the thicket of fellowship applications.

Prof. Sergio Servetto dies in plane crash

Professor Sergio Servetto died on Tuesday in a tragic plane crash. It’s a real shock, and great loss. I had just talked to him at ISIT in Nice. He was very active in getting the IT student society going and will be missed greatly. I was unsure if I should link to the news here, but I think that there are people who read this blog, knew him, and would want to know.

UPDATE : The IT Student Society has more information.

some new-ish listening

Volta (Björk) — A strong and very different followup to Medulla. The songs on Volta trail off into strange minimal landscapes, as if you’re walking down a beach with pavilions set up for each song. I particularly liked “The Dull Flame of Desire” and “Innocence.”

Bonfires of Sao João (Forro in the Dark) — With guest vocals by David Byrne, Bebel Gilberto, and Miho Hatori, this album bounces along. I like almost all of the songs on here, and look forward to incorporating them into my new mix CDs…

Neon Bible (Arcade Fire) — It doesn’t have the manifesto-like feel of Funeral, but there are some songs on here that really got under my skin, like “Keep The Car Running.” I think it might start growing it on me.

Techarí (Ojos de Brujo) — I heard them described to me as the New Flamenco. They mix it up with Bhangra beats (“Todo Tiende”) and are the kind of music that makes me feel hipper than I am.

Rendezvous at the Nightery (Brandi Shearer & The Robin Nolan Trio) — This album is a mix of gypsy jazz, old country standards, and originals. I particularly liked “Coquette,” “Glory of Love,” and of course “Belleville Rendezvous.”

(Justice) — This album seems to be making a splash on KALX, but my friend J. told me about it when I was in Paris (I still have to write about it or post a photo or something, argh). Mostly Daft Punk-ish, the album also has the disco pop tune “D.A.N.C.E.,” which too addictive for its own good.

Cansei De Ser Sexy (Cansei De Ser Sexy) — Electro, then clash, then electroclash, then clashelectro. Often hilarious, in yer face, and good for driving or bouncing. “Alala” and “Let’s Make Love And Listen To Death From Above” are the popular tracks, I bet, but most tracks have something to offer up.

LCD Soundsystem (Sound of Silver) — They are North Americans, yes they are. Good beats, but overall the album just kind of went in one ear and out the other. There are some good tracks on here for grooving though.

The Book of My Enemy

Via BookSlut, a link to a poem by Clive James entitled “The Book of my Enemy Has Been Remaindered.” My favorite bit: “And (oh, this above all) his sensibility, / His sensibility and its hair-like filaments, / His delicate, quivering sensibility is now as one / With Barbara Windsor’s Book of Boobs, / A volume graced by the descriptive rubric / ‘My boobs will give everyone hours of fun.'”

ITW Boondoggle?

I have a paper (poster) at the Information Theory Workshop in Lake Tahoe for the first week of September. I figured Lake Tahoe has a lot of accomodation, and in early September it should be pretty easy to find a cheap-ish place to stay. Little did I realize that all registered participants are being coerced into staying at the conference center itself. The two cheap “options” (i.e. non-deluxe) that are available are the following:

Double room, per person + all meals – $700.80 for 4 days
Staying away from the center + all meals – $336.00 for 4 days

The “registration fee” is misleading. If you are a student from say, Berkeley, Stanford, Davis, or some other school within driving distance, and you think “oh, it might be nice to go to the workshop and the IEEE Student rate is only $100,” think again! In addition to your cheap hotel off-site, you will have to pay an extra $336 for food that is likely to be so-so and may violate your eating restrictions!

Is this the Standard Operating Procedure when it comes to workshops? Is my shock unwarranted?