http://ergodicity.net/2008/02/12/how-much-should-we-review/ a process whose average over time converges to the true average Thu, 24 May 2012 18:00:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://ergodicity.net/2008/02/12/how-much-should-we-review/#comment-1226 Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:42:30 +0000 http://ergodicwalk.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-1226 I guess or is the usual figure people mention. In terms of Information Theory, its relatively narrow in that ISIT, ITW and Allerton are pretty much the only conferences and almost all full papers appear in the transactions. It would be interesting if the transactions could add to the annual reviewer list how many journal and conference papers each reviewer reviewed. For profs who use supervised reviewing as part of student training, a system could award half credits to each.

]]>